Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

0955

reference
323-tree-1
name
0955
tree-preservation-order

undefined

323-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.018575 50.866581)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.018547 50.866578,-1.018548 50.866583,-1.018552 50.866588,-1.018558 50.866592,-1.018566 50.866595,-1.018575 50.866596,-1.018584 50.866595,-1.018598 50.866589,-1.018602 50.866584,-1.018604 50.866578,-1.018603 50.866572,-1.018599 50.866567,-1.018592 50.866563,-1.018576 50.866560,-1.018559 50.866563,-1.018548 50.866572,-1.018547 50.866578)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL